Recreational Drug Use

What is right? Is there right? Are you right?

Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by Spectre557 on Tue May 19, 2009 3:24 pm
([msg=23961]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

Heath Winchester wrote:And really, couldn't the government make millions off of Drugs?

I completely agree, and this is why I think it's a win-win situation if they legalise drugs. Instead of spending millions/billions of pounds/dollars on it, they instead earn a shedload of cash, some of which could be invested into drug rehabilitation, the NHS, and other public services which would need extra funding.
Current obsession: Minecraft
User avatar
Spectre557
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:04 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by epitaph44 on Tue May 19, 2009 3:39 pm
([msg=23963]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

Some people (such as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger) are beginning to realize this.

If everyone smoked pot, there'd be no war :lol:


There has recently been a proposed bill that states that marijuana would be sold and taxed openly in California to adults 21 and older.

In my view at least, this is far too good to be true. Although, it is a step in the right direction. People should really be looking at why marijuana is illegal. In my opinion, alcohol is exponentially worse than some other recreational drugs. Humans should be aloud to choose certain things for themselves. This should be one if them.
User avatar
epitaph44
New User
New User
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 7:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by AtlasDark on Tue May 19, 2009 7:37 pm
([msg=23973]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

Trying not to bias based on what I'm told, as I believe that we were all told at one point or another that drugs can only lead to death and destruction; of course, certain drugs do carry with them detrimental side-effects and present health hazards.

Here's one (rather crazy) pitch - what if we were to create a synthetic (per se) drug, one that we have spawned in laboratories rather than DIY botanical gardens? If scientists can create such, the substance would only cause certain events to occur, certain reactions to follow, and can be sold, meaning a monetary benefit for business/gov't and a psychological benefit for consumers. It boils down to this: what if we were to fund drug research, or the creation of a "more perfect" drug?
User avatar
AtlasDark
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by neocontra on Wed May 20, 2009 12:18 am
([msg=23975]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

Drugs aren't going to prevent wars. Just the illegalization of drugs will cause certain wars. The war on drugs has been extremely effective at costing the American taxpayers millions upon millions of dollars.

Legalizing marijuana would take that particular drug out of the informal economy of the U.S. and put it in the formal economy, taking it out of the hands of drug dealers, gangs, and other degenerates and putting it in a more docile setting. Thus those degenerates would have to find another way to make their money, and with our money and manpower away from the war on pot and put toward stopping more serious drugs (like meth, coke, heroin, etc), that will be much more difficult.
User avatar
neocontra
New User
New User
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by AtlasDark on Wed May 20, 2009 5:40 am
([msg=23989]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

Didn't the counterculture already attempt to separate from society on the premise of peace, tolerance, friendship, and the use of certain drugs? Seems to me that it didn't work so well, though I don't recall what drug they were using.
User avatar
AtlasDark
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by Heath Winchester on Wed May 20, 2009 9:21 am
([msg=24000]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

Eh...LSD. ;) Bad LSD at that. My mom had some that was cut with rat poison.
I don't need my parents anymore. Google answers all my questions now.

"Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong."-Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Heath Winchester
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:41 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by AtlasDark on Wed May 20, 2009 2:39 pm
([msg=24040]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

The concept seemed well-intentioned, though they were horribly underequipped and poorly structured to do so and went about it (perhaps) the wrong way.

Which leads me to ask the question: What went wrong? Was it really the drug use that caused the prevalence of violence and such, or was it a social structure collapsing? I tried looking into this but gained no definitive answer, only more of the generalisation that "drugs caused them to fail, end of story." I believe there may be another factor that led to the collapse of the counterculture.
User avatar
AtlasDark
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by ph4nt0m on Fri May 22, 2009 6:36 am
([msg=24166]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

I think whatever a person puts in their body is purely up to them and shouldn't be regulated by the government. Not that I would encourage kids to shoot up, but that should be a moral parents should teach the kids when they were younger. My parents always told me that weed was evil and wrong and it clearly isn't. The reason I smoke isn't because I feel like I'm getting away with murder or something. It simply feels good, man.
User avatar
ph4nt0m
New User
New User
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 6:22 am
Location: Florida
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by Heath Winchester on Fri May 22, 2009 1:56 pm
([msg=24201]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

AtlasDark wrote:The concept seemed well-intentioned, though they were horribly underequipped and poorly structured to do so and went about it (perhaps) the wrong way.

Which leads me to ask the question: What went wrong? Was it really the drug use that caused the prevalence of violence and such, or was it a social structure collapsing? I tried looking into this but gained no definitive answer, only more of the generalisation that "drugs caused them to fail, end of story." I believe there may be another factor that led to the collapse of the counterculture.


The biggest thing I believe was that they simply had too forget it. Vietnam changed people. I don't think it had anything to do with drugs. Without Vietnam I don't even know if there would've been such a prominent hippie culture. But Vietnam was, in my opinion, also the destroyer. But the drugs didn't do anything except maybe they smoked too much pot and weren't motivated enough but seriously; it takes a lot of weed to do that. Many of them were very active in other aspects so I don't consider it to be very important.
I don't need my parents anymore. Google answers all my questions now.

"Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong."-Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Heath Winchester
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:41 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Recreational Drug Use

Post by AtlasDark on Fri May 22, 2009 7:55 pm
([msg=24208]see Re: Recreational Drug Use[/msg])

I see your point. The war was quite a stimulus.
User avatar
AtlasDark
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


PreviousNext

Return to Ethics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests