Page 3 of 4

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:56 pm
by TheMindRapist
He said he was joking, but I don't think he was...

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:18 pm
by krauser2288
omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 8:28 pm
by ELorenz
Ok so i know this shows how much information I don't know, but what is that series? is it a crypto algorithm or something? I google'd it and didn't find anything.

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:17 am
by Jimmy_xor
krauser2288 wrote:omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

I read the whole post.. I can explain why I am going to report you.
The series you posted is logic mission 28 which you haven't completed yet. And now you posted it here so that someone "by accident" can help you with it.

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:42 am
by Jimmy_xor
I've decided to answer all the challenges given in this forum.

Proof for DeMorgan's law [I'll take the more general version] (A union B union C ...)^c = A^c intersection B^c intersection C^c ...
Take x in (A union B union C ...)^c.
Then x is not in (A union B union C ...).
This implies that x is not in A, not in B, not in C, ...
Therefore x is in A^c, in B^c, in C^c, ...
=> x is in A^c intersection B^c intersection C^c ...

It's a known fact that 0.99999999999...=1 (and that 0.122999999999...=0.123 and so on).

About comperr's challenge written in wikipedia code. It isn't allowed to take \infty - \infty.

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 9:52 am
by krauser2288
Jimmy_xor wrote:
krauser2288 wrote:omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

I read the whole post.. I can explain why I am going to report you.
The series you posted is logic mission 28 which you haven't completed yet. And now you posted it here so that someone "by accident" can help you with it.


what?!?!?!?are you listening what you are saying?i was joking!!!!!!!did it seems that i really need help for the mission?

omg i will delete it because you are capable to bann me for this

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:50 am
by PC_MAGAS
Hay you can't divine each part with different value.
in this example x isn't the same with y
YOU SHOULD DIVINE ONLY WITH (X-Y) OR (X+Y) ORX OT Y OR Z WHI BELONGS TO IR

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:57 am
by IncandescentLight
Wow you guys are good at maths. Guess you all are High IQs.

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:07 pm
by katsa
yourmysin wrote:1$=100c=(10c)²=(0.1$)²=0.01$=1c


You cannot convert 10c to 0.1$ inside the ( )², you need to raise it to the ² power first, and then convert.
Based on the same logic:

60 hours = 3600 minutes = 60² minutes = 1² hours = 1 hour

Re: Math proof

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:26 am
by Inferno96
gotta square the units