Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

What is right? Is there right? Are you right?

Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by comperr on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:48 pm
([msg=6663]see Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

For those of you who don't know
wikipedia wrote:Schrödinger's Cat: A cat, along with a flask containing a poison, is placed in a sealed box shielded against environmentally induced quantum decoherence. The flask is shattered, releasing the poison if a Geiger counter detects radiation. Quantum mechanics suggests that after a while the cat is simultaneously alive and dead, in a quantum superposition of coexisting alive and dead states. Yet when we look in the box we expect to see the cat either alive or dead, not a mixture of alive and dead.


Lets assume instead of a cat we have a human. And a person (Bob) places another human (Alice) inside the box and seals the box close. Some time later Charles opens the box and sees Alice dead.

Who should responsible for the murder?
User avatar
comperr
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:52 pm
Location: /dev/null
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by Domevlo on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:52 pm
([msg=6664]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

I'd have to go with Bob, because usually we prosecute the people that create the potentially murderous situations, rather than the people who discover them.
"At a stage in life when most men prosper, I am reduced to living in Philadelphia!"
Domevlo
New User
New User
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by MastaChuck on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:54 pm
([msg=6667]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

well she was both alive and dead untill charles opened the box, maybe that means he half killed her :roll:
MastaChuck
New User
New User
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by comperr on Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:09 pm
([msg=6668]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

Domevlo wrote:I'd have to go with Bob, because usually we prosecute the people that create the potentially murderous situations, rather than the people who discover them.

What if he claimed that he was going to discover a way to open the box such that Alice would be alive. In that case it would be Charles that killed Alice, not Bob.
User avatar
comperr
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:52 pm
Location: /dev/null
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by Domevlo on Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:15 am
([msg=6670]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

comperr wrote:What if he claimed that he was going to discover a way to open the box such that Alice would be alive. In that case it would be Charles that killed Alice, not Bob.

Well did he claim that?
"At a stage in life when most men prosper, I am reduced to living in Philadelphia!"
Domevlo
New User
New User
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by comperr on Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:33 pm
([msg=6715]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

lets say he did - what would you say?
User avatar
comperr
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:52 pm
Location: /dev/null
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by OneArrow on Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:01 am
([msg=6745]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

comperr wrote:lets say he did - what would you say?


I'd say that they are both responsible - Bob for creating the situation that he knew could kill Alice, and Charles for accidentally "pulling the trigger," so-to-speak. Intent goes a long way in determining sentence, but it does not absolve one from reality.
OneArrow
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 8:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by thedotmaster on Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:57 pm
([msg=6868]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

If you see someone hanging by their fingernails off a cliff, about to fall, and there is a rope and a large rock so you could get them up, but you decide not to, and you let them fall - is that murder?
Image
User avatar
thedotmaster
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 984
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: North West UK
Blog: View Blog (1)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by OneArrow on Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:28 pm
([msg=7029]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

thedotmaster wrote:If you see someone hanging by their fingernails off a cliff, about to fall, and there is a rope and a large rock so you could get them up, but you decide not to, and you let them fall - is that murder?


Depends, did you put them in that situation in the first place?
OneArrow
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 8:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder

Post by thedotmaster on Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:31 am
([msg=7054]see Re: Schrödinger's Cat and Murder[/msg])

OneArrow wrote:Depends, did you put them in that situation in the first place?

No, but you could very easily - at no risk to yourself - get them out of that situation.
Image
User avatar
thedotmaster
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 984
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: North West UK
Blog: View Blog (1)


Next

Return to Ethics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests