by winter-owned on Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:23 pm
([msg=61468]see Re: When is one a "Hacker"?[/msg])
This seems like a silly, semantic question. It's obviously not too silly, because I'm inclined to open my big mouth. I don't understand why it matters other than as a matter of definition. I think the terminology that surrounds hacking is ambiguous to say the least.
I understand the frustrations of a hacker, who, as a programmer, gets confused with kids "hacking" peoples websites to do God knows what.
At the same time, the 99% of the population needs some sort of term to refer to these kiddies. No one says their silly little webpage was "cracked" into. The term English speakers have agreed upon is "hacked into". The hacker community, by latching on to that very name has set itself up for the very issue it now complains of. You can't everyday people who barely use their personal computers and talk about hacking a few times a year to distinguish the difference between hackers and crackers.
I have, one time only, "hacked" a website and caused it to function differently to the way the person who wrote the script intended it to. According to the hacker community that alone would not earn me any kudos necessarily. That is fine, but how would I explain to my Mom what it was up to?