ICR wrote:Venus and the gas giants have the wrong kind of gases for humans (or any other life forms) to survive there.
ICR wrote:There is no global evidence of long periods of time between these layers or indications that these layers took long periods of time to form.
TalkOrigins wrote:I asked Austin [man presenting lecture] whether he had any evidence that any of the more typical sedimentary rock - limestone, sandstone, or shale, had ever been deposited rapidly, but he provided no such example.
[...]
Austin also failed to mention why, if these forests in Yellowstone were such good models for catastrophic burial and coal formation, they do not contain any coal deposits.
[...]
Many of the sedimentary strata in and around the Grand Canyon contain the tracks of animals. The red Kayenta formation, exposed nearer to Glen Canyon Dam, contains the tracks of dinosaurs. I have seen these tracks personally, and told Austin so. I asked Austin to comment on the fact that these tracks exist, and are difficult to square with a catastrophic formation of the layers of the Grand Canyon. It is inconsistent to have all life on earth obliterated by a flood, and then have animal tracks in the layers deposited by the flood. Austin stated that these certainly were animal tracks, laid down by animals walking through mud or sand, but he never satisfactorily explained how animals could happily meander through an area so soon after a global catastrophe.
Well here's an interesting article on young earth creationism.
What they did was count backwards using the incredibly boring chapters of lineage in the Bible which go "And X beget Y, beget Z, beget...". However, they also assume that most, if not all, of these people lived at least a hundred years, and some many more (eg Noah supposedly lived to be over 900 years old). They make these assumptions because - you guessed it - the Bible says so.
if conditions on Earth were slightly different, we would not be able to survive. They argue that conditions are perfect because God made life and made the conditions perfect. They have the cause and effect the wrong way round. Life didn't make the conditions happen. The perfect conditions are what allowed life to exist. Of course life can only evolve on a planet suited to sustain the particular type of life.
Heath Winchester wrote:I am a long time researcher of the both Evolution and Creation theories. None are proven as of yet.
Mardoct09 wrote:Heath Winchester wrote:I am a long time researcher of the both Evolution and Creation theories. None are proven as of yet.
Stopped reading there. Evolution is as proven as gravity and particle theory. Notice it is called particle THEORY. Why? In science, a theory has evidence going for it. Simple postulations are a HYPOTHESIS.
Evolution IS SCINETIFIC FACT.
Possumdude0 wrote:Mardoct09 wrote:Heath Winchester wrote:I am a long time researcher of the both Evolution and Creation theories. None are proven as of yet.
Stopped reading there. Evolution is as proven as gravity and particle theory. Notice it is called particle THEORY. Why? In science, a theory has evidence going for it. Simple postulations are a HYPOTHESIS.
Evolution IS SCINETIFIC FACT.
What specific evidences do you know for evolution that make you believe it is a scientific fact?
sanddbox wrote:Common sense. duh. there is plenty of evidence for it...look around you. In what SCIENTIFIC way could animals have evolved like they did? Having buttsex with squirrels?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests