Racist Website

[aNewHobby4me]

So...you should only hack websites of people you *agree* with? <joke>

No, you should not hack websites of people who aren't YOU.

That's why it was clearly marked as a joke.

This topic should have been closed after AY7's post.

Doesn't the freedom of speech extend to continuing to speak when someone else wants you to remain silent?
< only 0.5 joke>

[sidebottom]

So...you should only hack websites of people you *agree* with? <joke>

No, you should not hack websites of people who aren't YOU.

That's why it was clearly marked as a joke.

This topic should have been closed after AY7's post.

Doesn't the freedom of speech extend to continuing to speak when someone else wants you to remain silent?
< only 0.5 joke>

The point is you shouldn't hack ANY websites that aren't yours. Your "joke" was basically saying "well, if you don't hack the people you don't like then who do you hack?" My answer was NO ONE.

My comment on the topic being closed was not literal. I meant that AY7 covered EVERYTHING that needed to be covered and didn't need any rebuttal if you are an advocate of free speech (which surprisingly it seems you and some others here are not).

If you believe silencing the hate speech of others is OK then you DO NOT believe in free speech and you don't deserve it either.

[aNewHobby4me]

The point is you shouldn't hack ANY websites that aren't yours. Your "joke" was basically saying "well, if you don't hack the people you don't like then who do you hack?" My answer was NO ONE.

You really need to understand what a joke is, lad. I was poking fun of two things at once. The first was the simple "people you disagree with vs. people you do agree with" as a hacking target. The second was about hacking in general.
And for those without a sense of humor I clearly labeled it as a joke--not to be taken seriously.

Example:
"You shouldn't eat your sister's ice cream snack before dinner." Turn this one around and say, "well it must be okay to eat your sister's ice cream snack *after* dinner", when of course you shouldn't eat it at all--it belongs to your sister, not you. This is known as a humorous twist.

My comment on the topic being closed was not literal. I meant that AY7 covered EVERYTHING that needed to be covered and didn't need any rebuttal if you are an advocate of free speech (which surprisingly it seems you and some others here are not).

Again, you missed the mark. My half-joke was aimed at your comment that the topic be closed. That is, that no one else should say anything about it, either pro or con. I say half-joke because it amused me that a self-proclaimed advocate of free speech would not want a topic debated. What does *not* amuse me is that you brand me as being against free speech.

If you believe silencing the hate speech of others is OK then you DO NOT believe in free speech and you don't deserve it either.

Okay, now you fascinate me. Explain further how some people 'deserve' rights ( when they agree with you ), and some people do not 'deserve' rights( when you think they disagree with you).

[tph23]

Freedom of Speech allows anyone the freedom to say whatever they want. And if you think about it, attacking that website doesn't really solve that problem. It makes you no better person to confront the problem in that manner.

[Mentalikryst]

Sorry, but HTS does not condone or encourage illegal activities. And (if the server is in the USA) all content is protected by the 1st ammendment. Just try and think what type of people spend money and time to create websites like that. They are useless bums themselves scared of people who are no different than us, except for a few genes out of many.

[godofcereal]

We are discussing our thoughts not hts, if we were this be locked.

[aNewHobby4me]

We are discussing our thoughts not hts, if we were this be locked.

Gee, and I thought this tread was finally dead.

To bring this post somewhat back on topic:
The original question:

Hello everyone,

I registered to this website because I would like to know your opinion on racist website.

From your point of view is it ethical to attack racist website?

The question is not "is it legal" or even "is it ethical", but what's your opinion?

[godofcereal]

Dude, I wish this was dead ages ago.

[aNewHobby4me]

Dude, I wish this was dead ages ago.

I agree. But it seems that someone pokes it with a stick every three weeks or so. See you on or about May 5th, or as they say here, Cinco de Mayo

[overlord69]

fight fire with fire...