Math proof

He said he was joking, but I don't think he was...

omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

by **ELorenz** on Fri May 02, 2008 8:28 pm ([msg=1950]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Ok so i know this shows how much information I don't know, but what is that series? is it a crypto algorithm or something? I google'd it and didn't find anything.

krauser2288 wrote:omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

I read the whole post.. I can explain why I am going to report you.
The series you posted is logic mission 28 which you haven't completed yet. And now you posted it here so that someone "by accident" can help you with it.

I've decided to answer all the challenges given in this forum.

Proof for DeMorgan's law [I'll take the more general version] (A union B union C ...)^c = A^c intersection B^c intersection C^c ...
Take x in (A union B union C ...)^c.
Then x is not in (A union B union C ...).
This implies that x is not in A, not in B, not in C, ...
Therefore x is in A^c, in B^c, in C^c, ...
=> x is in A^c intersection B^c intersection C^c ...

It's a known fact that 0.99999999999...=1 (and that 0.122999999999...=0.123 and so on).

About comperr's challenge written in wikipedia code. It isn't allowed to take \infty - \infty.

Jimmy_xor wrote:
krauser2288 wrote:omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

I read the whole post.. I can explain why I am going to report you.
The series you posted is logic mission 28 which you haven't completed yet. And now you posted it here so that someone "by accident" can help you with it.

what?!?!?!?are you listening what you are saying?i was joking!!!!!!!did it seems that i really need help for the mission?

omg i will delete it because you are capable to bann me for this

Hay you can't divine each part with different value.
in this example x isn't the same with y
YOU SHOULD DIVINE ONLY WITH (X-Y) OR (X+Y) ORX OT Y OR Z WHI BELONGS TO IR

Wow you guys are good at maths. Guess you all are High IQs.

by **katsa** on Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:07 pm ([msg=4128]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

yourmysin wrote:1$=100c=(10c)²=(0.1$)²=0.01$=1c

You cannot convert 10c to 0.1$ inside the ( )², you need to raise it to the ² power first, and then convert.
Based on the same logic:

60 hours = 3600 minutes = 60² minutes = 1² hours = 1 hour

gotta square the units