Math proof

Mathematics and Science; the subtle and ubiquitous arts

Re: Math proof

Post by TheMindRapist on Fri May 02, 2008 2:56 pm
([msg=1927]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

He said he was joking, but I don't think he was...
Image
User avatar
TheMindRapist
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:57 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by krauser2288 on Fri May 02, 2008 3:18 pm
([msg=1928]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?
krauser2288
New User
New User
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:38 am
Location: greece
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by ELorenz on Fri May 02, 2008 8:28 pm
([msg=1950]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Ok so i know this shows how much information I don't know, but what is that series? is it a crypto algorithm or something? I google'd it and didn't find anything.
ELorenz
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by Jimmy_xor on Sat May 03, 2008 5:17 am
([msg=1961]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

krauser2288 wrote:omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

I read the whole post.. I can explain why I am going to report you.
The series you posted is logic mission 28 which you haven't completed yet. And now you posted it here so that someone "by accident" can help you with it.
Jimmy_xor
New User
New User
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:35 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by Jimmy_xor on Sat May 03, 2008 5:42 am
([msg=1962]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

I've decided to answer all the challenges given in this forum.

Proof for DeMorgan's law [I'll take the more general version] (A union B union C ...)^c = A^c intersection B^c intersection C^c ...
Take x in (A union B union C ...)^c.
Then x is not in (A union B union C ...).
This implies that x is not in A, not in B, not in C, ...
Therefore x is in A^c, in B^c, in C^c, ...
=> x is in A^c intersection B^c intersection C^c ...

It's a known fact that 0.99999999999...=1 (and that 0.122999999999...=0.123 and so on).

About comperr's challenge written in wikipedia code. It isn't allowed to take \infty - \infty.
Jimmy_xor
New User
New User
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:35 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by krauser2288 on Sat May 03, 2008 9:52 am
([msg=1969]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Jimmy_xor wrote:
krauser2288 wrote:omg i was joking.......don't you read the whole post?!?!?!?!?

I read the whole post.. I can explain why I am going to report you.
The series you posted is logic mission 28 which you haven't completed yet. And now you posted it here so that someone "by accident" can help you with it.


what?!?!?!?are you listening what you are saying?i was joking!!!!!!!did it seems that i really need help for the mission?

omg i will delete it because you are capable to bann me for this
krauser2288
New User
New User
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:38 am
Location: greece
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by PC_MAGAS on Fri May 09, 2008 10:50 am
([msg=2163]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Hay you can't divine each part with different value.
in this example x isn't the same with y
YOU SHOULD DIVINE ONLY WITH (X-Y) OR (X+Y) ORX OT Y OR Z WHI BELONGS TO IR
PC_MAGAS IS O VASILEUS OF COMPUTERS
BUT FOR WOMEN I'M THE FAIRYTALE'S PRINCE
User avatar
PC_MAGAS
New User
New User
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 11:20 am
Location: Greece Aharnes Attiki
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by IncandescentLight on Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:57 am
([msg=4040]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Wow you guys are good at maths. Guess you all are High IQs.
Speak softly and carry a big stick -Theodore Roosevelt

http://www.rhetoricalcatch.blogspot.com
User avatar
IncandescentLight
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:16 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by katsa on Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:07 pm
([msg=4128]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

yourmysin wrote:1$=100c=(10c)²=(0.1$)²=0.01$=1c


You cannot convert 10c to 0.1$ inside the ( )², you need to raise it to the ² power first, and then convert.
Based on the same logic:

60 hours = 3600 minutes = 60² minutes = 1² hours = 1 hour
katsa
New User
New User
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 11:58 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by Inferno96 on Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:26 am
([msg=4173]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

gotta square the units
Inferno96
New User
New User
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:06 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


PreviousNext

Return to Math & Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests