Math proof

Mathematics and Science; the subtle and ubiquitous arts

Re: Math proof

Post by ELorenz on Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:00 pm
([msg=1548]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

If anyone has any problems they would like to present to see if someone can prove them that would be a good exercise to. I'll put this one out there.( as a general statement, don't put your homework problems up here though ).

See if you can come up with a proof for DeMorgan's law, (A union B)^c = A^c intersection B^c. I'm using ^c to denote compliment.

Here's another proof to go through also. There are a whole lot of things wrong with this proof see if you can find them all.

Show that a + t^2 is a subspace of the polynomials given that a is a scalar and t is a variable.

take two vectors of the form a + t^2 and show that vector addition holds. Let a and b be arbitrary scalars, (a + t^2) + ( b + t^2 )= (a+b) + 2(t^2)= divide through by 2 = (a+b)/2 + t^2, so it's of the form a scalar added to a variable, so it's closed under addition.

Now show that it's closed under scalar multiplication. Let c be an arbitrary scalar, then c(a+t^2) = ca + ct^2 = ca/c + t^2 which is of the right form, so it's a subspace.

The correction to the composition of functions proof was correct
ELorenz
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by TheMindRapist on Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:30 pm
([msg=1781]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

What do you guys make of this?

_
.9=x
_
10x=9.9
_ _
10x - x = 9.9 - .9

9x = 9

x = 1
_
.9 = 1

Can you spot the mistake?
Or is there one?
Image
User avatar
TheMindRapist
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:57 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by ELorenz on Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:57 pm
([msg=1808]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

The problem is that you are not being consistent with what you're doing with the equation. If you subtract x from the left side you have to subtract x from the right side. so the equation would have to look like 10x - x = 9.9 - x, or 10x - .9 = 9 - .9. Even though x = .9 you can't interchange the two when manipulating the equation, you have to use the same thing for each side for an operation. That line is what leads to the incorrect solution.

It was a nice idea unfortunately incorrect
Last edited by ELorenz on Fri May 02, 2008 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
ELorenz
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by comperr on Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:37 pm
([msg=1814]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Heh - I used to make these up daily in boring math professors classes.

Here is a recent one: I used wikipedia code for it cause its hard to type out
Code: Select all
<math>\sum_{n=5}^\infty \frac{n}{1} = \infty</math><br />
<math>\sum_{n=6}^\infty \frac{n}{1} = \infty</math><br />
<math>5 + \sum_{n=6}^\infty \frac{n}{1} = \sum_{n=5}^\infty \frac{n}{1}</math><br />
<math>5 + \sum_{n=6}^\infty \frac{n}{1} - \infty = \sum_{n=5}^\infty \frac{n}{1} - \infty</math><br />
<math>5 = 0</math><br />
User avatar
comperr
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:52 pm
Location: /dev/null
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by comperr on Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:38 pm
([msg=1815]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Oh and no one add it to the page - I want to add it myself tommrow
User avatar
comperr
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:52 pm
Location: /dev/null
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by TheMindRapist on Thu May 01, 2008 12:03 pm
([msg=1846]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Heh, the _'s didn't space properly, I meant .9 to be .9 repeating infinitely, as in
.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
ect
Image
User avatar
TheMindRapist
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:57 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by comperr on Thu May 01, 2008 9:10 pm
([msg=1888]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

User avatar
comperr
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:52 pm
Location: /dev/null
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by ELorenz on Fri May 02, 2008 12:54 am
([msg=1910]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

Interesting, I haven't ever run into that before, but I don't know that much about real analysis or series.

Was the last one I posted too much?
ELorenz
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by krauser2288 on Fri May 02, 2008 5:33 am
([msg=1913]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

*EDIT*
just forget it........
Last edited by krauser2288 on Sat May 03, 2008 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
krauser2288
New User
New User
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:38 am
Location: greece
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Math proof

Post by Jimmy_xor on Fri May 02, 2008 12:00 pm
([msg=1922]see Re: Math proof[/msg])

krauser2288, please remove that or I will report you...
Jimmy_xor
New User
New User
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:35 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


PreviousNext

Return to Math & Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests