So bout that Syria..

Current events and political views (It's not liberal vs conservative , it's better versus worse!)

So bout that Syria..

Post by mShred on Mon Sep 02, 2013 3:56 pm
([msg=77198]see So bout that Syria..[/msg])

Seems like with all the talk about Syria, EVERYONE has different ideas on what we should/will/can/can't do. I've been in about a hundred arguments between work, home, and IRC about the matter.
I'm curious to see what everyone else has to say about the matter. Thoughts?

PS: I'm normally not the one for politics at all, but I figured I'd try and spark a conversation.
Image

For those about to rock.
User avatar
mShred
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (2)


Re: So bout that Syria..

Post by Shade_of_Gray on Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:21 pm
([msg=77206]see Re: So bout that Syria..[/msg])

I tend to have something of a non-interventionist stance... I'd argue that if the Syrians want our help, they should petition to be annexed as another state. Then, if it passes, we protect them as our own citizens, from enemies foreign or domestic.

It might be argued that this is imperialism. That may be, but at least it's more honest about our intentions to make miniature United States out of other countries.
Shade_of_Gray
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: So bout that Syria..

Post by Goatboy on Mon Sep 02, 2013 6:28 pm
([msg=77208]see Re: So bout that Syria..[/msg])

Shade_of_Gray wrote:I tend to have something of a non-interventionist stance... I'd argue that if the Syrians want our help, they should petition to be annexed as another state. Then, if it passes, we protect them as our own citizens, from enemies foreign or domestic.

It might be argued that this is imperialism. That may be, but at least it's more honest about our intentions to make miniature United States out of other countries.

I am on my kindle and don't feel like typing a ton, but basically this.
Assume that everything I say is or could be a lie.
1UHQ15HqBRZFykqx7mKHpYroxanLjJcUk
User avatar
Goatboy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:35 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: So bout that Syria..

Post by Skyfa11 on Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:45 pm
([msg=77214]see Re: So bout that Syria..[/msg])

does America really need to police the world?
User avatar
Skyfa11
New User
New User
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:04 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: So bout that Syria..

Post by Shade_of_Gray on Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:55 pm
([msg=77215]see Re: So bout that Syria..[/msg])

Skyfa11 wrote:does America really need to police the world?


Those who think so would usually argue something along the lines of "instability in the rest of the world represents a threat to America, so America must take preemptive action to neutralize or reduce the threat."
Shade_of_Gray
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: So bout that Syria..

Post by -Ninjex- on Tue Sep 03, 2013 1:19 am
([msg=77216]see Re: So bout that Syria..[/msg])

Shade_of_Gray wrote:
Skyfa11 wrote:does America really need to police the world?


Those who think so would usually argue something along the lines of "instability in the rest of the world represents a threat to America, so America must take preemptive action to neutralize or reduce the threat."


Yet going to war is one of the biggest threats you could place on your country. It doesn't reduce the threat, it just puts the country in harms way.

I personally feel that our military should be a purely defensive military. One that will take actions only to defend their country if a "threat" is made towards us. This does not include what people would call another country blowing itself up. It's like "oh hey, bro you can't kill people!", followed by "Now, Billy, give me a gun to kill the people killing people." I don't feel like Syria really poses a threat, even since they have flat out said "We did not do this." This alone tells me they really aren't a threat to the US.

Who knows who did the chemical attack anyway? We are just pointing fingers and marching into combat in the direction it's pointed. For all we know, it could have been a terrorist attack, derp a derp :shock:

Imagine if that happened here, no doubt in my mind says that no matter who did it, 100% of the time, the government would say it was a terrorist attack from elsewhere, and we wouldn't have any countries coming in trying to piss on our soil.


As a refresher, I believe the military needs to exist, of course. I just believe that compromise should negotiated if possible; and if we can't, and the country is an actual threat to the safety of ours, then we set up defensive percautions. Fuck all of the super hero shit, we aren't batman. We are a country that is already head over heels in dept, and we spend only God knows how much for military equipment each year.
If you're not willing to learn, no one can help you. If you're determined to learn, no one can stop you.⠠⠵
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
User avatar
-Ninjex-
Addict
Addict
 
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: So bout that Syria..

Post by Shade_of_Gray on Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:20 am
([msg=77219]see Re: So bout that Syria..[/msg])

-Ninjex- wrote:I personally feel that our military should be a purely defensive military. One that will take actions only to defend their country if a "threat" is made towards us. This does not include what people would call another country blowing itself up.


This.
Shade_of_Gray
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)



Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests