AMD VS INTEL

Intel or AMD? nVidia or ATI? Lenovo or ASUS? All things computing hardware go here

AMD VS INTEL

Post by eweb100 on Sat Apr 19, 2008 4:26 pm
([msg=755]see AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

Well this is one of the biggest debates on the net. And i thought i might start one here!

Amd or intel.
I would have to go with amd.. I saw a amd processer duel core 3ghz for $150 and its intel counterpart was $250.

There have bin alot of tests about what will hapin if you take the coller tower off of the processer.
And intel has won about 90% of those tests. But the thing is...Amd isn't built for Dumm poeple who take of
the cooler tower!

O well this is just the start of the debate. Have fun =)
eweb100
New User
New User
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by Jesus_of_Suburbia on Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:31 am
([msg=788]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

It depends on processor generation,

486 and Prior, AMD had the cheaper chip, and since technology was essentially non-existant (compared to today, there was no MMX, SSE, 3DNOW etc.) there was no reason NOT to go with AMD other than popularity.

"Pentium" Era, AMD still had cheaper chips, and it wasn't until the Pentium MMX came out that AMD started to look bad, but given all of the problems the Pentium had with flop/div i'd say AMD was still the better choice.

"Pentium II" Era, Intel innovated here, they had the faster processors with the better technology. AMD had 3DNow, but that didn't really matter all that much...

"Pentium III" Era, I'd call it a draw, Intel and AMD had comprable processors (i guess a slight performance edge to intel), and only price gave AMD the edge, and even so, the price differnce wasn't all that much.

"Pentium 4" Era, AMD, totally AMD, First consumer 64 bit support (even if it's not useful, or complete), better quality, Hypertransport, and lower price totally blocked out that whole HyperThreading bullshit (and it was some plain old bullshit)

Dual Core Era, Intel. Despite Intel's dual core processor being two cores on one die (where as AMD has two totally independent cores) intel beat AMD to the market by at least 6 months.

Quad Core Era (ie: now), Intel. one word: Phenom (totally sucks shit...)

Of course, that doesn't take into account mobile, server and budget machines, places i think AMD does well in most of the time.

As much as i love AMD for being cheap, and the honest to goodness better processor (any AMD with the same clock speed as a same generation Intel will beat it hands down), they have failed recently due to their inability to put out a product that is quality.

AMD needs to start putting more cache memory on their chips, they have always had less than their intel's counterpart, but when the rival's top end in rocking 12mb L2, and you're rocking 2mb L2 (and a 2mb L3) then there's a problem here.

When the next generation comes (that would be the 6/12 core generation) we'll (hopefully) see a tie again, from what i can tell both Intel and AMD have a 6 core processor roadmapped within 1 month of the other, both look great on paper, but until real world performance is benchmarked it's impossible to call a winner.

So in short:
Single Core: AMD
Dual Core: Intel
Quad Core: Intel

While AMD may be cheaper, performance is key, i'd rather pay more for a workhorse. (unless i'm looking for a cheap computer)
Jesus_of_Suburbia
New User
New User
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by 3nIGhost on Sun Apr 20, 2008 8:07 am
([msg=797]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

Intel thats my opinion...
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

|Theodore Geisel (Dr. Seuss)
User avatar
3nIGhost
Experienced User
Experienced User
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:09 am
Location: NJ,USA
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by eweb100 on Sun Apr 20, 2008 1:48 pm
([msg=844]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

Well that pritty much sums it up...
eweb100
New User
New User
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by krauser2288 on Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:50 am
([msg=1056]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

i would choose intel cause the prize is not the main thing to compare.

intel's quality is better and thats why i have an intel core 2 duo 2.66 ghz and it works perfect
krauser2288
New User
New User
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:38 am
Location: greece
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by snakey on Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:23 am
([msg=1488]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

amd for the $$$ and the overclocking
snakey
New User
New User
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:18 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by SP534 on Thu May 01, 2008 2:22 pm
([msg=1866]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

AMD since that's all I know :D In all my time with comps I've never been disappointed with an amd chip, and they are cheap too ;)
SP534
New User
New User
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by GogaOEP on Thu May 01, 2008 10:52 pm
([msg=1901]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

I've built many workstations and servers for my own use and for others using Intel and AMD CPU's in the past. Conclusion I came to is that the quality I get from Intel is worth the price. They run cool, they're generally faster, and their stock coolers are great; I never buy a different cooler that what comes in the box with my Intel CPU. I would rather spend extra $50-100 on an Intel than worry about my CPU later on.
My signature is like Schrödinger's cat. Its here and its not.
GogaOEP
New User
New User
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:20 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by krauser2288 on Fri May 02, 2008 5:44 am
([msg=1914]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

GogaOEP wrote:I've built many workstations and servers for my own use and for others using Intel and AMD CPU's in the past. Conclusion I came to is that the quality I get from Intel is worth the price. They run cool, they're generally faster, and their stock coolers are great; I never buy a different cooler that what comes in the box with my Intel CPU. I would rather spend extra $50-100 on an Intel than worry about my CPU later on.


yeah intel has a better quality and it is better for overclocking
krauser2288
New User
New User
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:38 am
Location: greece
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: AMD VS INTEL

Post by vladiftodi on Thu May 22, 2008 12:52 pm
([msg=3022]see Re: AMD VS INTEL[/msg])

I personally never had an AMD processor
But heard people have some problems with them...
Intel for me as for now
vladiftodi
New User
New User
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 12:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Next

Return to Hardware

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests