Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Random things go here

Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Post by tremor77 on Tue Sep 27, 2011 2:52 pm
([msg=61888]see Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.[/msg])

I'm totally hung up on this and think it's absolutely amazing, and I'm already trying to think of a way to wrap my truck in Neutrinos and get to work in less than .00007ns on a Monday morning.

http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/220484/20110927/time-travel-albert-einstein-cern-large-hadron-collider.htm


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44629271/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/neutrinos-clocked-moving-faster-than-light-speed/


http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-09/baffling-cern-results-show-neutrinos-moving-faster-speed-light


http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/09/neutrinos-faster-than-light/


Just a couple links for your reading pleasure... Relativity what? What now Einstein.. eat it!
Image
User avatar
tremor77
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:00 pm
Location: New York
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Post by VPR3 on Tue Sep 27, 2011 3:48 pm
([msg=61895]see Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.[/msg])

I can read stuff like that all day......
I think Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity dealt with travel faster than the speed of light.
However, I would love to see what you truck looked like after accelerating at those speeds.
VPR3
Poster
Poster
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:35 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Post by fashizzlepop on Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:37 pm
([msg=61900]see Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.[/msg])

http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=58

This conclusion is still very much under scrutiny so I wouldn't call Einstein wrong yet.
The glass is neither half-full nor half-empty; it's merely twice as big as it needs to be.
User avatar
fashizzlepop
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 1:20 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Post by tremor77 on Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:51 am
([msg=61923]see Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.[/msg])

fashizzlepop wrote:http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=58

This conclusion is still very much under scrutiny so I wouldn't call Einstein wrong yet.


I read that a few years ago the same results had happened but the margin of error called it into question. This time at CERN the margin of error was reported to be something like 10ns and the Neutrino's clocked the trip at 60ns faster than light, well within that margin of error.

If the additional confirming studies show similar results that would prove to be quite exciting. I don't think relativity would be dead but need to be tweaked a little to accommodate for new findings.
Image
User avatar
tremor77
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:00 pm
Location: New York
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Post by cams on Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:39 am
([msg=64521]see Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.[/msg])

This would be amazing if FTL particles were really true. :)
cams
New User
New User
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Post by LoGiCaL__ on Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:26 pm
([msg=64556]see Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.[/msg])

Just because I remember this topic was somewhat necro'd yesterday, I read an update on it today. Here is the link: http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/02/breaking-news-error-undoes-faster.html
User avatar
LoGiCaL__
Addict
Addict
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.

Post by tremor77 on Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:14 am
([msg=64574]see Re: Faster Than Light - Neutrinos? Physics as we know it.[/msg])

Well it's appropriate that this topic was Necro'd - I heard on NPR this morning that they attributed false test results to a bad connection between a GPS and the computer that made the calculations. Will read the article, probably the same info.
Image
User avatar
tremor77
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:00 pm
Location: New York
Blog: View Blog (0)



Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests