Join Club Goat!

[Goatboy]

GP are non-refundable.

[sanddbox]

Lawl, HF users prove to be dumber and dumber:

http://www.hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=1096028&highlight=bitcoin

Some of their comments on the hackability of bitcoins are great.

[msbachman]

On another note, I'm really mad that 1 BTC used to be worth half a cent...if I had bought some a couple of years ago, I would be beyond rich now.

My guess is that if it catches on people will likely be saying the same thing a few years from now

Strange coincidence I was just linked to this article here, on subject.

Lol'd at that HF post "Easy hackable, and/or fake. ". Thanks for giving a reasoned explanation, bro!

-- Tue May 17, 2011 8:10 am --

OMG look at the dates: carl00s's post is from March of this year and he thinks it's either fake or a trojan. These people truly have no excuse.

[Gatito]

OMG look at the dates: carl00s's post is from March of this year and he thinks it's either fake or a trojan. These people truly have no excuse.

Can you blame him, they even put the topic under "Human Manipulation and Social Engineering", still for someone who has 250 posts........I see no hope.

[sanddbox]

article here, on subject.

I saw that article recently, which rekindled my interest in BTC and reminded me to start mining with my new computer, but that article definitely exagerrates some of the implications of BTC (BTC being banned by the governent within a year to a year and a half? Come on). I suspect that he's trying to drive demand for BTC up, thereby driving the value of BTC up and allowing him to turn a profit.

I really shouldn't be this cynical, but it's exactly what I would do if I had any journalistic power.

EDIT: Also, this is worth mentioning:

http://evilpacket.net/2011/may/17/stealing-bitcoins/

I've always said that CSRF and XSS are the two most common vulns, and this attack uses both.