As Jello Biafra once said, I believe during the HOPE conference, but I can't be sure, we are moving beyond simple capitalism and into a world of corporate feudalism. And our lords are becoming jealous lords. The push for protection of intellectual property (as if it's actually being infringed) appears to be almost paranoiac these days. The MPAA and the RIAA suing anyone and everyone for movie and music piracy--even those who don't have computers. Even suing Girl Scouts for singing copyrighted songs around the campfire.
Guitar tablature and lyrics sites are also taking the fall right about now. MxTabs.net, once one of the best resources for drum, bass, and guitar tabs on the internet was threatened with legal action by the music publishing industry until they took their site off the web. They returned briefly for awhile after several months, and then vanished again, informing us that the "new, all legal MxTabs will return." Giving more information, they revealed that it would be all legal to put up tabs on songs that they purchased licenses for. Not only that, but these licenses only grant the right for MxTabs to host personal interpretations of songs that their users work out by ear.
It is clearly a crappy time to want to enjoy anything on the internet. But it's the internet, when you get right down to it, that caused all of this. The internet is an example of an anarchic and socialist model. Nobody is in charge. Nobody has to pay anything to download Casino Royale off of Suprnova. It's just there, to be enjoyed. And yet the Motion Picture Association of America still continues to profit.
Doesn't this all have an air of desperation? Not convinced?
Windows Vista is the first OS ever constructed to take the right to use one's computer right out of the user's hands and place it in the hands of the Microsoft corporation. Digital Rights Movement protocols are written in between every function of Vista. Only DRM approved hardware (no generic stuff here! and you can bet your ass no outdated stuff, either) can play DRM improved DVDs and Blu-Rays on DRM approved monitors. Want to do something Microsoft doesn't want you to do? It isn't going to happen.
These corporations are desperate because of one thing. It used to be, there was only one way to get your hands on an entire album published by the RIAA. You could either buy it from a store, or be given it as a gift or a loan. You wanted to see a movie, you bought it or saw it at the theaters. When the tape recorder hit the market, the media giants first started to shake in their boots. The invention of the personal computer, especially in its current form, created a whole new multi-media platform. Another way to watch or listen to media produced by those very media giants. Throw in the internet, and the ability to store this media as data in a concrete location on your hard-drive, and you've got the very foundation of file-sharing.
These media giants have been used to decades of doing business one way, and now that there is a new variable in their market, they simply feel threatened. And rather than try and adapt to the new world like some smaller companies (such as Adult Swim, on whose website you can watch pretty much every new episode of every show they put out) they are trying to change the world back to suit them. An ancient, classic terrible last move.
These giants are dying because they can't face up to the fact that their model of business doesn't even exist anymore. They don't have a monopoly, and they can't get one back. And so, like a terrible monster that's been given the final blow, they're flailing uncontrollably in their death throes. And nothing could possibly be more dangerous.
In a sense, this could be considered a dark time. That feeling oppression that usually comes into mind with the word "master" is now more and more present with "Microsoft" and "government." In the days ahead, the only way to make sure that our model of digital exploration survives is to keep going, regardless of the new laws, regardless of the lawsuits, regardless of the claims of an obviously commercially owned government. To persevere in our way of life at this point in time is absolutely paramount.
We're in a deadly game of chicken, now. And we absolutely cannot flinch, and neither can they.
But we do have one distinct advantage.
We're not dying.
Cast your vote on this article *Note: the order of the votes has been reversed.
blackbun, congratulations for the article. you\'ve said what we all think and wrote what we all see...
Below you can see a link to \"A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection\" written by Peter Gutmann. It\'s a very interesting and professional analysis of the Vista DRM and it\'s effect. You all must read this :)
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
For the article: 10/10 from me. Keep up the good work.
~utererr
great article!
lol, Microsoft made a lot of enemies with their continued constant power/money-hungry surge even after they made their initial millions...
sidebottom - 09:59 am Wednesday October 31st, 2007
I don\'t understand the attacks on the DRM. Isn\'t stealing Cable TV a crime? Shouldn\'t it be? Shouldn\'t stealing any private or classified information be a crime (especially in the case of Sandy Berger stealing classified documents from the National Archives)? blackbun, if I wanted a copy of \"Fresh fruit for rotting vegetables\", don\'t you think your friend Mr. Biafra would be a little perturbed if I downloaded the whole thing rather than pay the meager $10 to own it legally and help him pay the bills? What if EVERYONE did that? How would Jello have the money to go give the talks he gives when he cannot afford food, nevermind plane fare. You wouldn\'t classify HIM as one of your so called \"corporate fascists\" and I doubt he is making millions, yet you\'d be quick to steal his hard work from him.
You all hate Microsoft yet without them and the other corporate giants none of us would be using our computers to complain about them.
Honestly, how many of you don\'t use ANY Microsoft products at all? Go ahead and brag in your replies if you don\'t, like that makes you better than everyone else but you know what? Open-source Linux OSs will always be inferior to concurrent products like Windows Vista as long as the only incentives to improve it are \"helping the community\" rather than increasing stock value and profits.
sidebottom-Very very true. I understand why people would get upset about not being able to download a $30 movie, but dang for the people that work how about we take your job away because it isn\'t needed for example.For fast-food, robots cooked your meals never need to go to McDonald\'s again or working in a factory(anyplace) all of a sudden people can get the stuff you make or do off computer technology. Well it sucks for you, because your out of a job.
Also if you like a band and want more of there kind of music why not support them by getting it for $15? Well if people can get movies without having to pay then guess what NO MORE movies.
I could understand about mx-tabs getting sued is pretty dumb, but for the real reason if people do stuff on their own, nobody needs a business. For windows if they didn\'t come out it may have been another 20 years before an operating system comes out, if not for microsoft(who owns Windows) you wouldn\'t have an X-box 360. So before people go and post arguments how about looking on both sides of view.
Well that\'s my argument I give a 5/10, because I\'m generous and It gave me something to argue about.
Wow. Honestly, I\'m surprised at this relatively positive reception of my admittedly un-planned out article. I should have edited it before posting it, but I guess it\'s done well enough, considering.
As far as the negative opinions go, I see where you\'re coming from. Honestly, for the most part, I agree. I\'m less referring to the glory of open source and piracy and more to the ridiculous lengths that corporations are going to try and stop it, rather than finding ways to adapt to it. That\'s the epitome of bad business.
If you can\'t adapt to new trends, you need to take a step out of the market. Microsoft (whose products I no longer use unless required of me. Furthermore, I DON\'T own an X-Box.) has decided that because they make crappy for-profit OSes and hardware that they can control what others can do with computers. And in a way they can, as long as you use their products. The Linux vs. Windows debate is long and exasperating and I have little patience and enough courtesy not to argue it here.
Suffice to say, in my humble opinion, a community that strives to perfect a piece of software (or art, or hardware, or a monument, or a government) have in mind only one thing. To make it better.
Multi-billion dollar corporations like Microsoft create their products with only one thing. To enslave for profit.
If you disagree, we can always try and register www.hackthissite.org as a paysite with one person in charge of the whole project and gets to divide the profits.
Thanks for the 5/10, though. :) I appreciate it much m
sidebottom - 12:05 am Thursday November 01st, 2007
Blackbun, that is an interesting thought about adapting to \"new trends.\" It seems that there was a market trend in the automotive industry recently called STEALING CARS. You know how they \"adapted\" to that trend? They improved security devices. They used GPS tracking devices, RFID keys, laser cut keys, alarm systems etc. Not all that different from how computer companies are now protecting the digital and intellectual rights of artists etc. Different means to the same end; protecting someone\'s constitutional right to safe property.
My disappointment here comes from everyone who is on the \"bash Microsoft bandwagon\" because it seems to be trendy (especially in this community) to hate the rich and successful rather than try to emulate them.
You state the following:
\"Multi-billion dollar corporations like Microsoft create their products with only one thing. To enslave for profit.\"
Now check out this info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_and_Melinda_Gates_Foundation
How much money have you people raised\\donated to get vaccines to children in third world countries lately? I bet it\'s less than the Gates\' $34 billion!
sidebottom - 12:09 am Thursday November 01st, 2007
And as for your final thought, you\'ve pretty much proved my point, albeit unknowingly. If hackthissite.org was a paysite then obviously we would not have nearly as many members. However, every member would be much more active and never again would someone post an article claiming \"...I should have edited it before posting it...\" We also would not have the same recycled articles over and over because it would be replete with properly researched and edited articles written by paid professionals, not highschool freshmen who want to h4x0r some jock that picks on them.
Don\'t get me wrong I am not attacking your article. I am just fed up with simple-minded hypocrites attacking corporations and the government like in some of your \"positive responses\".
I am merely proffering my experiences and my dissenting opinion here. We cannot do away with Microsoft and all live happily in tingly-wingly land with only open source software. Nor should we belittle the amazing acheivements of the open source community. I believe that both are crucial today and it would be nice to see some open minds in this community who agree.
Thank you for your opinion, Sidebottom. I\'ll certainly take your arguments into account and re-examine my own.
I don\'t want this to degrade into a flame war (as another response like your previous one might very well inspire me to do) so I\'ll just try to accept your opinions without hostility and move on.
i dont use microsoft. if open source OSs made such huge profits like microsoft does, THEN they wouldnt be \"inferior\". and i get the impression you consider them inferior because, well, they require a brain. there is no possible way you can deny the monopoly over the OS market which bill holds. why pay an already obscenely rich company money you wish you didnt have to spend? because you have no choice! not everybody can write their own drivers, and not everybody knows how to use wine or cedega, and not everybody understands why their .exe file they just downloaded wont execute! microsoft has simply provided a product that makes it extremely easy to manipulate a computer, making the experience of learning how to actually USE one obsolete. thats why people would rather shell out the $250 and be on their merry yet ignorant way...
It\'s nice to see that there is a definite lifeblood running through the denizens of the internet. And I agree with virtually everything the author is saying. Kudos for that article. 10/10.
I wouldn\'t exactly say they are dieing. maybe injured, but we do have to stay on our toes to help make sure this terrible thing does not happen, and there is the physical ways that they can make us comply.
Thinkingape - 07:16 pm Thursday January 31st, 2008
Nice article. I have to say we should not be so confident that we are not dying as well. The numbers of thinking people are being rapidly depleted. Critical thinking is something that very few people are capable of. I would suggest that anyone with even the smallest ability to hack should start a mission to post on news sites news about the Illegality of the Federal Reserve and the Income tax. That is the keystone to this horrible problem we see all around us on the internet and in our economy. Semper Fi!!!
This site is the collective work of the
HackThisSite staff. Please don't reproduce in part or whole without permission.
Page Generated: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:56:58 -0500 Exec:
10 Page loaded in 0.16043 seconds!
Interesting article! 10/10